There has been a significant decline in the "disruptiveness" of science and technology research papers published over the past few decades, according to an analysis of how much these papers depart from previous literature. Data from millions of manuscripts show that, compared to the mid-20th century, research from the 2000s was much more likely to incrementally push science forward, rather than veer off in a new direction and make previous work obsolete.
"Science cannot survive in a society that does not value truth and strive to discover it. The scientific community will gradually lose public support and slowly disintegrate in such a culture. The pursuit of truth requires academic freedom with open, passionate, and civilized scientific discourse": https://www.city-journal.org/article/harvard-tramples-the-truth
„That’s the way science works: when a journal decides to retract your paper, there is no discussion and no appeal. The journal is always right. No public discussions.
The medical journals get to decide what is true and what is not and evidence doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is their perception of reality.
"Science cannot survive in a society that does not value truth and strive to discover it. The scientific community will gradually lose public support and slowly disintegrate in such a culture. The pursuit of truth requires academic freedom with open, passionate, and civilized scientific discourse": https://www.city-journal.org/article/harvard-tramples-the-truth
Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03817-6
More than 2 million research papers have disappeared from the Internet: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00616-5
„That’s the way science works: when a journal decides to retract your paper, there is no discussion and no appeal. The journal is always right. No public discussions.
The medical journals get to decide what is true and what is not and evidence doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is their perception of reality.
There will be no debates. They have spoken.“
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/our-paper-critical-of-the-covid-vaccines?r=2soam&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
The higher the fluoride exposure, the higher the loss in IQ: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dr-philipe-grandjean-fluoride/
We „own“ the science: https://youtu.be/HzPWj3FC0-Q
Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02299-w
https://expose-news.com/2023/06/01/journals-retract-more-than-300-covid-papers/ — what does this say about the state of science today?
https://thepulse.one/2021/09/06/covid-science-wars-how-science-is-breaking-down/ - old but interesting analysis.