When the Circus becomes Politics.
With all that’s currently going on in the world (and has been for some time now), a number of friends asked what I thought of this “geopolitical madness” and what it could mean for the coming months, years and decades. As I’m not an expert in this field, I took the help of other friends writing this article — but do note that none of us are fortune tellers and nobody can accurately predict the future. Unfortunately this article didn’t turn out to be for the faint hearted, so keep in mind that while reading it — there is always a silver lining and that (as it’s true with almost everything), the size of the opportunity is diametrically proportional to overcoming the adversity at hand.
When I was a child I always wondered why we had different currencies around the world, why people were driving on different sides on the road, why electrical plugs to this very day are not common across the very same planet we live on, or why Gold isn’t the natural currency backing all other resources. I also didn’t comprehend why we needed so many politicians and governments in different countries, counties and local communities when we as a human species should represent ourselves as “ONE” in the face of the universe, to perhaps even (or so I thought after watching a few Star Trek movies) one day venture out in space to places where no man has gone before.
Little did I notice that not everyone shared my self-perceived “idealism” and it was only during my extensive travels over the past two decades and by meeting with peoples from many countries and walks of life, that I realized that any form of “oneness” can only ever be truly sustainable, or even slightly real, when it’s genuinely driven from within a form of universal consciousness, not just an individual’s or a groups’ collective ego. Coming to love the variety of the rich human culture which we’re able to manifest today with its beautiful sights, sounds and tasty foods and the opportunity to experience it in local communities taught me a connectedness no 15-minutes city or virtual reality tour ever could.
Before such realization however and in line with the logic mentioned above, I would have probably fully supported a one world government or a “New World Order” (NWO) — terms nowadays openly used by so many as the ultimate solution to our (mostly human made) problems. Today of course, and as many of my friends do, I see this a bit more distinguished. Michael for instance (who I know for a fact has researched this topic deeply) says:
“there is a concerted and long planned attempt at imposing a top down New World Order (“NWO”) from a relatively small clique of insecure people who are mostly afraid as they realise that they are not geniuses, yet they feel they should be shown deference and enjoy droits de seigneurs.”
This is a tough statement, but given the daily nonsense we’re encountering from health to politics to finance and the economy at large, I’ve asked my assistant Anna to take a closer look and present what she feels such “geopolitical madness” represents.
Examples for “Geopolitical Madness”
For starters you may want to take the time and listen to this conversation between David Sacks, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy a few months ago1. Then look at the following links and try to to discover what’s left of “normal” right now:
An exchange on X between Elon Musk and the German Government on the aspect of a coordinated invasion of Europe via Italy, courtesy of German NGOs.
A military alliance that has shipped off its weapons reaching the bottom of the barrel thereby unable to defend itself.
Unelected globalists determined to abolish farming, forcing Europeans into an insect-based diet using the strategy “No Farmers, No Food”.
A try to cover up a 3 fold increase in hospitalisations/deaths and weekly pilot deaths/incapacitations following the recent global vaccine rollout.
Readily available technologies such as energy production from air3 (which could help solve many of our problems) which are simply being kept under the carpet.
The Trojan horse of “One Health”, or rather a global takeover of everything in the form of a pandemic treaty, secretly working towards a “New Agenda”, despite its already distateful and bad track record.
Now this may be overwhelming and confusing to many, so perhaps using a single example will help shed some light on how one act of madness can lead to another: take the hidden healthcare crisis from British Columbia for instance — this horror fairy tale is a prime example of what can go wrong when evil meets ignorance.
With so much negativity and a blatantly obvious misuse of power, Michael says it’s important to focus on the positive alternatives by remembering what made Western civilizations into what they were/are, such as:
unguided scientific inquiry (i.e. being able to unfettered questioning current paradigms and orthodoxy / “consensus” — let's face it: Galileo would have been debunked after being fact checked today;
private property rights sacrosanct (i.e. “thou shall not steal”);
free speech/free debate of ideas;
all citizens inalienable rights vis a vis “the state” (collectivism vs. individualism).
So before reading on or getting dragged into a too pessimistic view of events, let’s remind ourselves that all we may need to do to change our destiny and the current state of affairs in the world is to simply remember living by these basic principles!
The Global Health Agenda
To understand the fundamental consequences of a globally driven health agenda and its impact on political leadership, watch this short video from Robert Malone, US based inventor of the mRNA technology, in which he explains his concerns for one unelected global organization having the ability to circumvent local constitutions and its elected leaders.
He isn’t alone. People from around the world have been criticizing this unprecedented power grab, including previously supportive doctors and politicians alike:
This happens while the world at large is fighting wars, inflation and multiple other issues, easily overlooking important aspects such as a new cold war over arctic resources, or, the subtle loss of morality in the face of so-called “professionalism”.
But first, let’s take a closer look at those proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”) and what they could mean for us:
Doing your duty as a sovereign citizen of this world, you may also want to read the quoted amendments in greater detail on the respective websites.4
You will discover that (provided an agreement on such a pandemic accord would even be reached), we’d relinquish our control over livestock and food supply whilst at the same time losing our bodily autonomy. Surely, given the catastrophic consequences of the unscientific policies over the recent years with more young and middle-aged adults dying in their sleep than ever before5, this can’t be a good idea.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Modern Times Opportunities to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.